Ring of protection: Difference between revisions
From Ashenzari's Archive
More actions
imported>Ge0ff m →History |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==History== | ==History== | ||
*Prior to [[0.27]], | *Prior to [[0.27]], you could find rings of protection with a -4 enchantment; such rings were always [[curse]]d. | ||
*Prior to [[0.25]] enchantments were random values between 1 and 6 (positive and negative). | *Prior to [[0.25]] enchantments were random values between 1 and 6 (positive and negative). | ||
{{jewellery}} | {{jewellery}} | ||
Revision as of 20:07, 16 March 2022
Version 0.28: This article may not be up to date for the latest stable release of Crawl.
| Type | Jewellery |
|---|---|
| Name | Ring of protection |
| Icon | 
|
| A ring that protects its wearer from harm. |
A +4 ring of protection boosts the AC of the wearer.
Desirability
All characters are going to want more AC, but sacrificing a ring slot for it may or may not be a good idea. Unlike most amulets, you can quickly swap rings, easily switching between them at need. Rings of protection are more likely to be useful for characters with low AC; mechanically, there is a much larger difference between 5 and 9 AC compared to 25 and 29. In particular, characters that cannot wear some or all types of armour (spriggans, ogres, trolls, octopodes, felids) will appreciate having a ring of protection.
History
- Prior to 0.27, you could find rings of protection with a -4 enchantment; such rings were always cursed.
- Prior to 0.25 enchantments were random values between 1 and 6 (positive and negative).